By comparing Modi to Hitler, Liberals show there is no place even for a democratically elected Hindu leader in India’s political system

I am a great fan of Shoaib Daniyal and his revisionist approach to history, from finding the benevolent benefactor of India’s masses in Aurangazeb to uncovering the evil communal tyrant in Bankim Chandra Chatterjee…  So, when I woke up to find this article in Troll, thoughts came flooding into my mind…

daniyal

(http://scroll.in/article/808377/by-comparing-akbar-to-hitler-bjp-shows-theres-no-place-for-even-a-good-muslim-in-indias-history)

Suddenly, I realized that Mr. Daniyal’s way of thinking can be extended to understand how, by comparing Modi to Hitler,  Indian liberals are showing that there is no place for a democratically elected leader in India’s politics.

Let’s take Mr. Daniyal’s article bit by bit:

In August 2015, New Delhi’s Aurangzeb Road was renamed APJ Abdul Kalam Road by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. On the surface, this was done because Aurangzeb wasn’t a very nice man – or so goes most of popular Indian history. Of special note are his policies that supposedly discriminated against non-Muslims and his support for puritanical religion: a special tax on non-Muslims, temple destruction banning music and so on. So terrible is Aurangzeb’s image in modern India that not only Hindutva ideologues but even liberals and some left-wingers came out in support of the renaming.

For decades,  liberals across India protested against the  actions of the RSS. On the surface, this was done because RSS aren’t very nice people – or so goes most of popular Indian liberal discourse. Of special note are their policies that supposedly discriminate against non-Hindus and support for puritanical religion: support for Uniform Civil Code, equal status for Kashmiris with rest of Indians, beef ban and so on. So terrible is the RSS image in liberal circles that not only Congis but even mediawallahs and lots of intellectuals came out against the RSS.

Now, after Aurangzeb, the BJP has set its sights on Akbar Road, another street in Lutyens’ Delhi…..the party’s national spokesperson, Shaina Chudasama – who, in a rush of enthusiasm, declared that Akbar was like Hitler.”

Now, after RSS, Indian liberals have set their sights on Prime Minister Modi, the elected leader of India. Liberal organization Awaaz, in a rush of enthusiasm, fused the Om Symbol with the Nazi Swastika and showed Modi wielding a sinister sword:

avaaz

Let’s read Shoaib Daniyal’s article further:

Aurangzeb and his great-grandfather Jalaluddin Akbar are the Cain and Abel of popular Mughal history. Even while Aurangzeb is reviled, his great-grand father Akbar shines through as an embodiment of the Idea of India: a broad-minded, catholic ruler who united the large parts of the subcontinent under one flag and also happened to be Muslim….. That even Akbar is now being targeted shows just how far to the Right India has moved. From now, practically no Muslim can stake a firm claim to be a part of the country’s historical pantheon – not even if you were one of the country’s most powerful emperors in all of its history.

RSS/Hindutva on the one side and ordinary Hindus/democratic elections are the Cain and Abel of our political system. Even while RSS and Hindutva are reviled by liberals, acceptance of ordinary Hindus and their democratically elected leaders used to be an embodiment of the idea of India. Modi is a Prime Minister who received 170 million votes but also happens to be a Hindu. That even Modi is being cast as a Nazi shows just how far to the left Indian liberals have moved. From now on, no Hindu can stake a firm claim to be a legitimate Indian Prime Minister – not even if you have won the largest democratic mandate in the entire history of humanity.

Akbar made alliances with Hindu Rajputs, who were the backbone of his army – even at Haldighati, Akbar entrusted his forces to a Rajput, Man Singh (who has his own Delhi road).

The elected BJP governments have made alliances with Muslim National Conference and PDP in Kashmir. Even while picking an Indian President for the first time, the BJP picked a Muslim, Dr. AP J Abdul Kalam (who has his own Delhi road).

Jalaluddin, it seems, even left formal Islam, founding a religion called the Deen-e-Ilahi, angering the Muslim clergy – a grudge held till today by conservative Muslims.

Modi it seems even gave a slogan of “Pehle Shauchalaya, fir Devalaya” (Toilets first, temples later), angering many conservative Hindus, a grudge held by many even today…

However, in spite of these spades of liberalness, why is Akbar in the cross-hairs today?

However, in spite of winning the largest democratic mandate in human history, why is Modi being called a Nazi today?

The answer is simple: the powerful demand to strike out Akbar Road shows rather clearly that the move to rename Aurangzeb Road had very little to do with the character of Aurangzeb itself. …any Muslim ruler simply has no place in the popular historical imagination as an Indian anymore.

The answer is simple: the powerful demand by liberals to label Modi as Hitler has very little to do with the size of Modi’s mandate. Any Hindu ruler simply has no place in liberal imagination as an Indian anymore.

While Akbar and Aurangzeb are attacked for their faults – an easy enough thing to do given how different modern values are from medieval times – Pratap is let off. Temple destruction is a hot topic of debate but untouchability and caste is silently forgotten. Tsunamis of uninformed outrage crash onto the internet over the Mughal treatment of Hindus but there is pin-drop silence on the Rajput treatment of Dalits.

While RSS and Modi are attacked for their faults – an easy enough thing to do given that neither of them has imposed Emergency, the Dynasty is let off. Beef ban in Maharashtra by BJP is a hot topic of debate but beef ban imposed by Congress in entire North India is silently forgotten. Tsunamis of uninformed outrage crash onto the internet over BJP’s treatment of Kanhaiya Kumar, but there is pin-drop silence on the hacking to death of Bajrang Dal worker Prashant Poojary in Karnataka.

In the end, the personal qualities of the icons India choses is hardly the matter here – it is their religious community. India is simply hurtling towards becoming a mirror image of Pakistan. Pakistan’s Muslim nationalism disallows it from accepting non-Muslims into its popular historical pantheon. The country literary begins its history from the time Islam enters Sindh….

In the end, the personal qualities of the icons Indian liberals choose is hardly the matter here – it is their religious community. India is simply hurtling towards becoming a mirror image of Pakistan. Pakistan’s Islamism disallows it from accepting non-Muslims and democratically elected leaders into its political pantheon. Indian liberals begin India’s history from the time Jawaharlal Nehru became Prime Minister and conceived the idea of India…

Friends, please stay connected with this blog on the FB page:

https://www.facebook.com/Dynastycrooks-859306900864294/

Advertisements

22 thoughts on “By comparing Modi to Hitler, Liberals show there is no place even for a democratically elected Hindu leader in India’s political system

  1. BJP to announce it’s UP CM candidate in October-November according to this article.Who do you think it should be?Yogi Adityanath,Mahesh Sharma,Smriti Irani,etc are some of the names being discussed.My guess is that they will go with Smriti.BJP’s seat tally in UP has been declining after every election but I think BJP will make significant gains this time.I actually don’t want BJP to win UP but I want them to win as many seats as possible(not enough to form the government but enough to pick up a large chunk of RS seats).This is because I am sure that Mayawati will screw up badly,just like how Nitish and Lalu will screw up Bihar and we need to do well in both UP and Bihar in 2019 and Mayawati bungling(likely)will help BJP a lot in 2019.http://www.dailyo.in/politics/bjp-up-polls-narendra-modi-amit-shah-2014-lok-sabha-polls-smriti-irani-yogi-adityanath/story/1/10791.html

    Like

      1. I would have supported Smriti Irani too, but I have a fear that if Maya manages to spread the “ManuSmriti Irani” jibe like wildfire, BJP’s goose is cooked. Not making Dalits angry is top priority, even more than winning Uttar Pradesh.

        Like

      1. It’s really saddening to see that mayawati is in strong position in UP. Sometimes I am wondering why as a nationalist party bjp has to struggle a lot everywhere? Eventhough except bjp, almost all parties are anti Hindu and anti India except few exceptions.I know bjp also has some waste, but it’s really pity to see that, some states still prefer parties like SP,BSP,RJD,AAP,TRS. I mean why our country is full of these idiots who still prefer thugs to rule them?

        Like

  2. ISRO launched a mini space shuttle yesterday but the Economist presents the classic argument of socialists and asks why India is spending money on space programs and not on poverty(for them,it’s a zero-sum game).I just hope India grows fast in the next 15-20 years which it is well on course to do.Hopefully,in 2030,we won’t see these nonsense questions being posed.For that,Modi will have to stay till 2029.

    Like

    1. The Economist is one of the last bastions of colonial superiority complex. It should be printed on toilet paper.

      Having said that however, it must be pointed out that at the moment ISRO does not have rocket boosters of sufficient power to launch a full-scale space shuttle. If I recall correctly (and I am happy to be corrected), our GSLV can put roughly 1,000kg into orbit, whereas the US can put up to 2,500kg into orbit.

      Like

        1. I believe this is incorrect. The P in PSLV stands for “polar”. It cannot put any satellite into a geosynchronous orbit, nor is it intended to. Mangayaan was launched by using a highly elliptical orbit and firing off the mars rover when it was farthest from the earth. No country can put more than 2,500 or 3,000 into a geo-stationary orbit. If you have a source, please share it. Thanks.

          Like

  3. Although, Mr. Daniyal has somewhat better reputation than most writers in Daily O, the Web Site has become very anti-Hindu, anti-Modi site. In so being, it accepts from any two bit authors who follow the site’s agenda.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s